PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-11.77%
Negative revenue growth while STERV.HE stands at 2.21%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
4.85%
Gross profit growth under 50% of STERV.HE's 31.26%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-106.45%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-106.45%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-48.94%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-48.48%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-48.48%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
62.27%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x STERV.HE's 43.00%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
78.55%
Positive FCF growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-10.52%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-6.75%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-11.35%
Negative 3Y CAGR while STERV.HE stands at 0.98%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
282.17%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
313.21%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x STERV.HE's 8.43%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
52.30%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
-92.17%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-95.17%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-95.17%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
126.55%
10Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x STERV.HE's 103.37%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if strong ROE or conservative payout policy fosters faster book value growth.
44.92%
5Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of STERV.HE's 63.63%. Martin Whitman would question a shortfall in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.
36.06%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x STERV.HE's 24.73%. Bruce Berkowitz confirms timely buybacks or margin improvements drive stronger near-term equity growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.97%
Firm’s AR is declining while STERV.HE shows 2.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-6.14%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
2.88%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x STERV.HE's 2.61%. Bruce Berkowitz sees if the firm's investments effectively outpace the competitor in future returns.
1.87%
Positive BV/share change while STERV.HE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-1.33%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.82%
SG&A growth well above STERV.HE's 1.54%. Michael Burry sees potential margin erosion unless it translates into higher sales or brand equity.