PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-10.62%
Negative revenue growth while STERV.HE stands at 2.70%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-15.02%
Negative gross profit growth while STERV.HE is at 41.80%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-101.62%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-104.08%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-125.44%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-125.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-125.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
1.75%
Share change of 1.75% while STERV.HE is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
1.74%
Diluted share change of 1.74% while STERV.HE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
980.43%
OCF growth above 1.5x STERV.HE's 23.98%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
99.84%
FCF growth 50-75% of STERV.HE's 182.61%. Martin Whitman would see if structural disadvantages exist in generating free cash.
-15.18%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-17.25%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-16.22%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-36.47%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-50.76%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-59.59%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
-213.66%
Both face negative decade-long net income/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect a shrinking or highly disrupted sector.
-140.00%
Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.
-110.32%
Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.
96.74%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with STERV.HE's 99.98%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
15.63%
Below 50% of STERV.HE's 36.48%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
-0.11%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.94%
We show growth while STERV.HE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-0.40%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-3.91%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
400.22%
Debt growth far above STERV.HE's 18.58%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.