PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.07%
Negative revenue growth while UPM.HE stands at 5.42%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-2.07%
Negative gross profit growth while UPM.HE is at 16.85%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
88.57%
EBIT growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 36.59%. David Dodd would confirm if core operations or niche positioning yield superior profitability.
88.57%
Operating income growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 36.59%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent cost or pricing advantages drive this outperformance.
575.00%
Net income growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 5.33%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
500.00%
EPS growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 3.03%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
500.00%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 3.03%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
21.87%
Share change of 21.87% while UPM.HE is at zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if slight buybacks (or dilution) matter in the bigger picture.
21.87%
Diluted share count expanding well above UPM.HE's 0.33%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
163.64%
OCF growth at 50-75% of UPM.HE's 221.57%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
46.88%
FCF growth under 50% of UPM.HE's 409.26%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
4.37%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
4.37%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 75-90% of UPM.HE's 5.68%. Bill Ackman would encourage strategies to match competitor’s pace.
4.37%
Positive 3Y CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-79.64%
Both show negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking or too capital-intensive.
-79.64%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while UPM.HE is at 191.79%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-79.64%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while UPM.HE stands at 83.73%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
148.72%
Positive 10Y CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
148.72%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 61.99%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
148.72%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 50.55%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.99%
Inventory growth well above UPM.HE's 2.72%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
3.41%
Positive asset growth while UPM.HE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-13.05%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
1.72%
We have some new debt while UPM.HE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.