PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.65%
Negative revenue growth while UPM.HE stands at 2.84%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-3.65%
Negative gross profit growth while UPM.HE is at 2.21%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-169.57%
Negative EBIT growth while UPM.HE is at 3.02%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-169.57%
Negative operating income growth while UPM.HE is at 3.02%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-310.71%
Negative net income growth while UPM.HE stands at 74.56%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-312.50%
Negative EPS growth while UPM.HE is at 69.70%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-312.50%
Negative diluted EPS growth while UPM.HE is at 75.00%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-0.84%
Share reduction while UPM.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-0.84%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-51.43%
Negative OCF growth while UPM.HE is at 68.67%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-160.87%
Negative FCF growth while UPM.HE is at 166.28%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
7.74%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
7.74%
Positive 5Y CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see an underappreciated edge for the firm vs. the competitor.
7.74%
3Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 0.97%. David Dodd would confirm if there's an emerging competitive moat driving recent gains.
181.17%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
181.17%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 10.72%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
181.17%
3Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of UPM.HE's 505.95%. Michael Burry would worry about a significant short-term disadvantage in generating operational cash.
40.69%
Similar net income/share CAGR to UPM.HE's 41.12%. Walter Schloss would see parallel tailwinds or expansions for both firms.
40.69%
Below 50% of UPM.HE's 387.37%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
40.69%
Below 50% of UPM.HE's 219.20%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.58%
Inventory is declining while UPM.HE stands at 4.23%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
-7.23%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-5.44%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-10.45%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.