PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
4.01%
Positive revenue growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
103.08%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 34.96%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
98.14%
EBIT growth 75-90% of UPM.HE's 126.09%. Bill Ackman would push for cost reforms or better product mix to narrow the gap.
98.14%
Operating income growth at 75-90% of UPM.HE's 126.09%. Bill Ackman would demand a plan to enhance operating leverage.
92.82%
Net income growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 14.71%. David Dodd would check if a unique moat or cost structure secures superior bottom-line gains.
92.17%
EPS growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 21.05%. David Dodd would review if superior product economics or effective buybacks drive the outperformance.
92.17%
Diluted EPS growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 21.05%. David Dodd would see if there's a robust moat protecting these shareholder gains.
-8.36%
Share reduction while UPM.HE is at 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-8.36%
Reduced diluted shares while UPM.HE is at 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
115.38%
Positive OCF growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
205.88%
Positive FCF growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-4.63%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-4.63%
Negative 5Y CAGR while UPM.HE stands at 2.44%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-4.63%
Negative 3Y CAGR while UPM.HE stands at 38.03%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
536.09%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
536.09%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 11.72%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
536.09%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
85.78%
Positive 10Y CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
85.78%
Positive 5Y CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
85.78%
Below 50% of UPM.HE's 173.26%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.15%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-2.08%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
8.39%
Positive BV/share change while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-1.14%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.