PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
1.92%
Positive revenue growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
1.44%
Positive gross profit growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-86.34%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-86.34%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-94.29%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-93.02%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-93.02%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-23.54%
Share reduction while UPM.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-23.54%
Both reduce diluted shares. Martin Whitman would review each firm’s ability to continue repurchases and manage option issuance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
206.25%
OCF growth 1.25-1.5x UPM.HE's 139.85%. Bruce Berkowitz would see if superior pricing or efficient operations explain the gap.
146.94%
FCF growth under 50% of UPM.HE's 850.00%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
9.04%
Positive 10Y revenue/share CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a distinct advantage in product or market expansion over the competitor.
9.04%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 4.76%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
9.04%
3Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of UPM.HE's 32.97%. Michael Burry might see a serious short-term decline in relevance vs. the competitor.
-35.72%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while UPM.HE stands at 5.31%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-35.72%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while UPM.HE is at 76.77%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-35.72%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while UPM.HE stands at 2.13%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
113.33%
Positive 10Y CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
113.33%
Positive 5Y CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
113.33%
Positive short-term CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.40%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
1.64%
Positive asset growth while UPM.HE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
33.53%
BV/share growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 0.23%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
2.50%
We have some new debt while UPM.HE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.