PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.02%
Negative revenue growth while UPM.HE stands at 1.86%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-4.03%
Negative gross profit growth while UPM.HE is at 52.91%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-16.95%
Negative EBIT growth while UPM.HE is at 80.25%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-16.95%
Negative operating income growth while UPM.HE is at 80.25%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
120.00%
Net income growth at 75-90% of UPM.HE's 142.55%. Bill Ackman would press for improvements to catch or surpass competitor performance.
200.00%
EPS growth 1.25-1.5x UPM.HE's 144.44%. Bruce Berkowitz would check if strategic initiatives like cost cutting or better capital management explain the difference.
200.00%
Diluted EPS growth 1.25-1.5x UPM.HE's 144.44%. Bruce Berkowitz would verify if strategic moves (e.g., targeted acquisitions, cost cuts) explain the edge.
-26.67%
Share reduction while UPM.HE is at 0.32%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-26.67%
Reduced diluted shares while UPM.HE is at 0.29%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
5272.73%
Dividend growth of 5272.73% while UPM.HE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.
-108.37%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-148.00%
Negative FCF growth while UPM.HE is at 200.00%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-2.89%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while UPM.HE stands at 0.13%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-2.89%
Negative 5Y CAGR while UPM.HE stands at 3.43%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-32.38%
Negative 3Y CAGR while UPM.HE stands at 11.15%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
79.10%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
79.10%
5Y OCF/share CAGR is similar to UPM.HE's 79.05%. Walter Schloss might see parallel cost profiles or expansions producing comparable cash flow.
84.71%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
120.93%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 56.73% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
120.93%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 21.50%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
300.00%
Positive short-term CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.04%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while UPM.HE is at 4.47%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.87%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
4.86%
We show growth while UPM.HE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
0.06%
Positive asset growth while UPM.HE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
32.93%
Positive BV/share change while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
3.44%
Debt growth far above UPM.HE's 4.25%. Michael Burry fears the firm is taking on undue leverage vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.39%
SG&A growth of 5.39% while UPM.HE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.