PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.44%
Both firms have declining sales. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry slump or new disruptive entrants.
-1.81%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
-25.98%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-25.98%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-32.26%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-28.53%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-28.53%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-5.16%
Share reduction while UPM.HE is at 0.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-5.16%
Reduced diluted shares while UPM.HE is at 0.46%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
581.58%
Positive OCF growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
429.66%
Positive FCF growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-19.12%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-19.12%
Negative 5Y CAGR while UPM.HE stands at 29.12%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-24.93%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
538.22%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
538.22%
Positive OCF/share growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
439.86%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
116.94%
Positive 10Y CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
116.94%
Below 50% of UPM.HE's 1676.24%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
128.56%
Positive short-term CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.76%
Both show negative short-term equity/share CAGR. Martin Whitman suspects an industry slump or unprofitable expansions for both players.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.88%
Our AR growth while UPM.HE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
0.06%
We show growth while UPM.HE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-0.31%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
1.94%
Positive BV/share change while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-2.98%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
7.12%
SG&A growth of 7.12% while UPM.HE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.