PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.11%
Negative revenue growth while UPM.HE stands at 1.74%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-61.24%
Negative gross profit growth while UPM.HE is at 322.43%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-37.55%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-37.55%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-1.12%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-1.12%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-1.12%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-28.76%
Negative OCF growth while UPM.HE is at 7.44%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on real cash generation.
-3.72%
Negative FCF growth while UPM.HE is at 19.15%. Joel Greenblatt would demand improved cost control or more strategic capex discipline.
-27.90%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-32.57%
Negative 5Y CAGR while UPM.HE stands at 6.08%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-16.60%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
51.94%
10Y OCF/share CAGR at 50-75% of UPM.HE's 81.88%. Martin Whitman might fear a structural deficiency in operational efficiency.
455.18%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 10.82%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
292.15%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 9.29%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
136.84%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of UPM.HE's 249.73%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
216.86%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 30.63%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
-39.15%
Negative 3Y CAGR while UPM.HE is 112.77%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
6.18%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with UPM.HE's 6.06%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
0.42%
Below 50% of UPM.HE's 9.13%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
9.72%
Below 50% of UPM.HE's 32.67%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.12%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-5.02%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-0.63%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
1.28%
BV/share growth of 1.28% while UPM.HE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if small growth can compound into a strong advantage.
-2.10%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.02%
SG&A growth of 8.02% while UPM.HE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.