PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.40%
Revenue growth under 50% of UPM.HE's 7.89%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-0.13%
Negative gross profit growth while UPM.HE is at 697.59%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
3.20%
EBIT growth below 50% of UPM.HE's 116.24%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper competitive or cost structure issues.
3.20%
Operating income growth under 50% of UPM.HE's 116.24%. Michael Burry would be concerned about deeper cost or sales issues.
4.89%
Net income growth under 50% of UPM.HE's 128.05%. Michael Burry would suspect the firm is falling well behind a key competitor.
7.69%
EPS growth under 50% of UPM.HE's 133.33%. Michael Burry would suspect deeper structural issues or share dilution limiting per-share gains.
7.69%
Diluted EPS growth under 50% of UPM.HE's 133.33%. Michael Burry would worry about an eroding competitive position or excessive dilution.
-2.60%
Share reduction while UPM.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.60%
Reduced diluted shares while UPM.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.87%
Positive OCF growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
30.49%
Positive FCF growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-34.34%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-2.62%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
6.36%
Positive 3Y CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
515.31%
Positive long-term OCF/share growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see a structural advantage in sustained cash generation.
16.93%
Positive OCF/share growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a comparative advantage in operational cash viability.
-22.54%
Both face negative short-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman would suspect macro or cyclical issues hitting them both.
306.82%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 26.61% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
76.98%
Positive 5Y CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
18.81%
Positive short-term CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
28.48%
10Y equity/share CAGR in line with UPM.HE's 28.53%. Walter Schloss might see both benefiting from stable profitability and moderate payout ratios over the decade.
27.95%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 17.78%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
20.26%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 7.98%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.55%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
-2.82%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
3.16%
Asset growth well under 50% of UPM.HE's 6.93%. Michael Burry sees the competitor as far more aggressive in building resources or capacity.
8.29%
BV/share growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 0.36%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-2.13%
We’re deleveraging while UPM.HE stands at 63.85%. Joel Greenblatt considers if we gain a balance-sheet advantage for potential downturns.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.04%
SG&A growth of 15.04% while UPM.HE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.