PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.47%
Revenue growth under 50% of UPM.HE's 5.95%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
-13.70%
Negative gross profit growth while UPM.HE is at 320.12%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-8.65%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-8.65%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-12.90%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-13.64%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-13.64%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.86%
Diluted share change of 0.86% while UPM.HE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a minor difference that could widen over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
102.71%
OCF growth above 1.5x UPM.HE's 27.67%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
54.81%
Positive FCF growth while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-7.66%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
28.63%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 7.99%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
14.18%
Positive 3Y CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
759.93%
10Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 28.90%. David Dodd would check if a superior product mix or cost edge drives this outperformance.
130.01%
5Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 0.28%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has better cost structures or brand premium boosting mid-term cash flow.
297.47%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
130.76%
Net income/share CAGR at 50-75% of UPM.HE's 223.25%. Martin Whitman might question if the firm’s product or cost base lags behind.
191.88%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 79.21%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
38.43%
Positive short-term CAGR while UPM.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
116.64%
10Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 43.07%. David Dodd would confirm if consistent earnings retention or fewer write-downs drive this advantage.
68.95%
5Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 31.77%. David Dodd might see stronger earnings retention or fewer asset impairments fueling growth.
29.57%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x UPM.HE's 10.76%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.29%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
2.86%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. UPM.HE's 6.37%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
5.47%
Asset growth at 75-90% of UPM.HE's 6.41%. Bill Ackman suggests reviewing opportunities to match or surpass the competitor's asset expansion if profitable.
3.51%
50-75% of UPM.HE's 6.64%. Martin Whitman suspects weaker earnings or capital allocation vs. the competitor.
-1.00%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
36.92%
SG&A growth of 36.92% while UPM.HE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees more spend on admin or marketing, expecting stronger top-line in return.