PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
12.29%
Revenue growth above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 4.81%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm has a unique advantage driving sales higher.
12.29%
Gross profit growth above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 2.93%. David Dodd would confirm if the company's business model is superior in terms of production costs or pricing.
-28.57%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-28.57%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-142.11%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-150.00%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-150.00%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
-15.79%
Share reduction while VALMT.HE is at 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-15.79%
Reduced diluted shares while VALMT.HE is at 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
48.84%
Positive OCF growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
36.00%
Positive FCF growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
43.62%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VALMT.HE's 29.63%. Bruce Berkowitz would investigate brand strength or geographical expansion fueling growth.
43.62%
5Y revenue/share CAGR above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 11.24%. David Dodd would look for consistent product or market expansions fueling outperformance.
43.62%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-36.71%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 278.13%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-36.71%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-36.71%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 192.67%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
89.53%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 8.49% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
89.53%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
89.53%
Positive short-term CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
1.51%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. VALMT.HE's 4.32%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
5.01%
Positive asset growth while VALMT.HE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
18.50%
Positive BV/share change while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
15.46%
We have some new debt while VALMT.HE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.