PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.45%
Revenue growth under 50% of VALMT.HE's 4.81%. Michael Burry would suspect a deteriorating sales pipeline or weaker brand.
0.45%
Gross profit growth under 50% of VALMT.HE's 2.93%. Michael Burry would be concerned about a severe competitive disadvantage.
-106.06%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-106.06%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-157.89%
Both companies face declining net income. Martin Whitman would suspect external pressures or flawed business models in the space.
-156.42%
Both companies exhibit negative EPS growth. Martin Whitman would consider sector-wide issues or an unsustainable business environment.
-156.42%
Both face negative diluted EPS growth. Martin Whitman would suspect an industry or cyclical slump with heightened share issuance across the board.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-228.57%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-100.00%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
6.92%
10Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of VALMT.HE's 29.63%. Michael Burry would suspect a lasting competitive disadvantage.
6.92%
5Y revenue/share CAGR at 50-75% of VALMT.HE's 11.24%. Martin Whitman would worry about a lagging mid-term growth trajectory.
6.92%
Positive 3Y CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a sharp short-term edge or successful pivot strategy.
-142.78%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 278.13%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-142.78%
Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.
-142.78%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 192.67%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
68.48%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 8.49% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
68.48%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
68.48%
Positive short-term CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
5.73%
Below 50% of VALMT.HE's 139.36%. Michael Burry would suspect poor capital allocation or persistent net losses eroding long-term equity build-up.
5.73%
Below 50% of VALMT.HE's 103.25%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.
5.73%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 0.47%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.09%
Inventory shrinking or stable vs. VALMT.HE's 4.32%. David Dodd confirms the company’s supply-chain is more efficient if sales are unaffected.
-2.20%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-1.19%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
-0.74%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.