PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.11%
Positive revenue growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
8.69%
Positive gross profit growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
-15.12%
Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.
-15.12%
Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.
-80.00%
Negative net income growth while VALMT.HE stands at 100.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-84.62%
Negative EPS growth while VALMT.HE is at 98.51%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-84.62%
Negative diluted EPS growth while VALMT.HE is at 98.51%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
30.00%
Share count expansion well above VALMT.HE's 0.57%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.
30.00%
Diluted share count expanding well above VALMT.HE's 0.57%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
240.32%
OCF growth above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 93.83%. David Dodd would confirm a clear edge in underlying cash generation.
167.70%
FCF growth above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 85.87%. David Dodd would verify if the firm’s strategic investments yield superior returns.
-28.85%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-28.85%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-29.64%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
623.18%
OCF/share CAGR of 623.18% while VALMT.HE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.
623.18%
OCF/share CAGR of 623.18% while VALMT.HE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.
181.38%
3Y OCF/share CAGR of 181.38% while VALMT.HE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.
105.76%
10Y net income/share CAGR of 105.76% while VALMT.HE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.
105.76%
Net income/share CAGR of 105.76% while VALMT.HE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.
-66.67%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VALMT.HE is 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt might call for a short-term turnaround strategy or cost realignment.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.48%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while VALMT.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.21%
Negative near-term dividend growth while VALMT.HE invests at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker short-term distribution policy unless justified by strategic spending.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.78%
We show growth while VALMT.HE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-1.92%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
-25.54%
We have a declining book value while VALMT.HE shows 108.28%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.
-7.64%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.