Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)

Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.

Both companies show negative EBIT growth. Martin Whitman would consider macro or sector-specific headwinds.

Both companies face negative operating income growth. Martin Whitman would suspect broader market or cost hurdles.

Positive net income growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.

Positive EPS growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.

Positive diluted EPS growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.

Share reduction while VALMT.HE is at 33.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.

Reduced diluted shares while VALMT.HE is at 33.45%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.

Dividend growth of 5272.73% while VALMT.HE is flat. Bruce Berkowitz would see if this can become a bigger advantage long term.

Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.

OCF/share CAGR of 79.10% while VALMT.HE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see a slight advantage that could compound over time.

OCF/share CAGR of 79.10% while VALMT.HE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if modest momentum can translate into a bigger competitive lead.

3Y OCF/share CAGR of 84.71% while VALMT.HE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz might see if small gains can expand into a broader advantage.

10Y net income/share CAGR of 120.93% while VALMT.HE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minor gains can compound into a bigger lead over time.

Net income/share CAGR of 120.93% while VALMT.HE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small mid-term gains can develop into a bigger lead.

3Y net income/share CAGR of 300.00% while VALMT.HE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz sees if minor improvements can widen to a bigger advantage.

Firm’s AR is declining while VALMT.HE shows 3.69%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.

We show growth while VALMT.HE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.

Positive asset growth while VALMT.HE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.

Positive BV/share change while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.

Debt shrinking faster vs. VALMT.HE's 13.76%. David Dodd sees a safer balance sheet if it doesn't impair future growth.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.