PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.640.06 (1.08%)
5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.60%
Negative revenue growth while VALMT.HE stands at 10.98%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-59.67%
Both firms have negative gross profit growth. Martin Whitman would question the sector’s viability or cyclical slump.
58.55%
Positive EBIT growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
58.55%
Positive operating income growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
331.94%
Positive net income growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
332.00%
Positive EPS growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
332.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
279.31%
Positive OCF growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
102.76%
Positive FCF growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-30.44%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-30.44%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-34.95%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
-29.20%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 52.97%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
-29.20%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while VALMT.HE is at 52.97%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
265.51%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 52.97%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
140.23%
Positive 10Y CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
140.23%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
227.62%
Positive short-term CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear advantage in near-term profit trajectory.
-18.41%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while VALMT.HE stands at 94.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-18.41%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while VALMT.HE is at 94.71%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
-22.84%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while VALMT.HE is at 94.71%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-45.38%
Both reduce receivables yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a shift in the entire niche’s credit approach or softer demand.
4.43%
We show growth while VALMT.HE is shrinking stock. John Neff wonders if the competitor is more disciplined or has weaker demand expectations.
-1.77%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
3.04%
Positive BV/share change while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff sees a clear edge over a competitor losing equity.
-6.26%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.95%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.