PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.80%
Negative revenue growth while VALMT.HE stands at 31.53%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.
-56.27%
Negative gross profit growth while VALMT.HE is at 23.28%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.
-80.35%
Negative EBIT growth while VALMT.HE is at 42.31%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.
-80.35%
Negative operating income growth while VALMT.HE is at 42.31%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.
-70.67%
Negative net income growth while VALMT.HE stands at 56.25%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.
-69.81%
Negative EPS growth while VALMT.HE is at 54.55%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.
-69.81%
Negative diluted EPS growth while VALMT.HE is at 54.55%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.
-2.89%
Share reduction while VALMT.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-2.89%
Reduced diluted shares while VALMT.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.83%
Positive OCF growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff would see this as a clear operational advantage vs. the competitor.
21.40%
Positive FCF growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff would see a strong competitive edge in net cash generation.
-24.72%
Both companies have negative long-term revenue/share growth. Martin Whitman would question if the entire market or product set is shrinking.
-24.72%
Both face negative 5Y revenue/share CAGR. Martin Whitman would suspect macro headwinds or obsolete product offerings across the niche.
-8.80%
Both firms have negative 3Y CAGR. Martin Whitman would wonder if the entire market segment is in short-term retreat.
65.54%
10Y OCF/share CAGR under 50% of VALMT.HE's 137.94%. Michael Burry would worry about a persistent underperformance in cash creation.
65.54%
Below 50% of VALMT.HE's 137.94%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
446.94%
3Y OCF/share CAGR above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 137.94%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm is quickly gaining an operational edge over the competitor.
108.19%
Below 50% of VALMT.HE's 326.88%. Michael Burry would worry about a sizable gap in long-term profitability gains vs. the competitor.
108.19%
Below 50% of VALMT.HE's 326.88%. Michael Burry would worry about a substantial lag vs. the competitor’s profit ramp-up.
102.79%
Below 50% of VALMT.HE's 326.88%. Michael Burry suspects a steep short-term disadvantage in bottom-line expansion.
-16.09%
Negative equity/share CAGR over 10 years while VALMT.HE stands at 98.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental red flag unless the competitor also struggles.
-16.09%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while VALMT.HE is at 98.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
10.00%
Below 50% of VALMT.HE's 98.01%. Michael Burry suspects a serious short-term disadvantage in building book value.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.25%
Firm’s AR is declining while VALMT.HE shows 20.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-2.35%
Both reduce inventory yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader move to lean operations or industry slowdown in demand.
-0.32%
Both reduce assets yoy. Martin Whitman suspects a broader sector retraction or post-boom asset trimming cycle.
1.41%
BV/share growth above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 0.87%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
-2.90%
Both reduce debt yoy. Martin Whitman sees a broader sector shift to safer balance sheets or less growth impetus.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.26%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.