PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.93%
Positive revenue growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
4.57%
Positive gross profit growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
29.21%
Positive EBIT growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
29.21%
Positive operating income growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
12.29%
Net income growth of 12.29% while VALMT.HE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if small gains can accelerate into a larger gap.
22.22%
EPS growth of 22.22% while VALMT.HE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can accelerate over time.
22.22%
Diluted EPS growth of 22.22% while VALMT.HE is zero. Bruce Berkowitz would see if minimal gains can be scaled further for a bigger lead.
-8.13%
Share reduction while VALMT.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company has a better buyback policy than the competitor.
-8.13%
Reduced diluted shares while VALMT.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt would see a relative advantage if the competitor is diluting more.
-100.00%
Both companies cut dividends. Martin Whitman would look for a common factor, such as cyclical downturn or liquidity constraints.
81.94%
OCF growth at 50-75% of VALMT.HE's 151.61%. Martin Whitman would question if the firm lags in monetizing sales effectively.
141.37%
FCF growth under 50% of VALMT.HE's 287.50%. Michael Burry would suspect weaker operating efficiencies or heavier capex burdens.
-31.36%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 17.17%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
-37.05%
Negative 5Y CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 17.17%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.
-6.92%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 22.94%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
-10.70%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 963.44%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.
38.92%
Below 50% of VALMT.HE's 963.44%. Michael Burry would be alarmed about sustained underperformance in generating free operational cash.
31.48%
Positive 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big short-term edge in operational efficiency.
145.83%
Net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 12.08% over 10 years. David Dodd would confirm if brand, IP, or scale secure this persistent advantage.
243.75%
5Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 12.08%. David Dodd would confirm if the firm’s strategy is more effective in generating mid-term profits.
88.80%
3Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x VALMT.HE's 63.64%. Bruce Berkowitz might see new markets, M&A, or better cost discipline driving the difference.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.23%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while VALMT.HE is at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees the competitor building net worth while this firm loses ground.
30.35%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 8.53%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-1.94%
Firm’s AR is declining while VALMT.HE shows 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees stronger working capital efficiency if sales hold up.
-3.32%
Inventory is declining while VALMT.HE stands at 2.64%. Joel Greenblatt sees potential cost and margin benefits if sales hold up.
2.14%
Positive asset growth while VALMT.HE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
11.35%
BV/share growth above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 2.28%. David Dodd confirms if consistent profit retention or fewer write-downs yield faster equity creation.
1.70%
We have some new debt while VALMT.HE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.90%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.