PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
9.08%
Positive revenue growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a notable competitive edge here.
120.47%
Positive gross profit growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff would see a clear operational edge over the competitor.
26.84%
Positive EBIT growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial edge in operational management.
26.84%
Positive operating income growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a competitive edge in operations.
28.03%
Positive net income growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a big relative performance advantage.
25.00%
Positive EPS growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a significant comparative advantage in per-share earnings dynamics.
25.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong relative advantage in controlling dilution.
0.58%
Share reduction more than 1.5x VALMT.HE's 1.22%. David Dodd would see if the company is taking advantage of undervaluation to retire shares.
0.58%
Slight or no buyback while VALMT.HE is reducing diluted shares. John Neff might consider the competitor’s approach more shareholder-friendly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-71.54%
Both companies show negative OCF growth. Martin Whitman would analyze broader economic or industry conditions limiting cash flow.
-74.46%
Both companies show negative FCF growth. Martin Whitman would consider an industry-wide capital spending surge or margin compression.
-27.12%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 16.10%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.
2.43%
5Y revenue/share CAGR under 50% of VALMT.HE's 16.10%. Michael Burry would suspect a significant competitive gap or product weakness.
-15.16%
Negative 3Y CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 30.58%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.
497.93%
10Y OCF/share CAGR in line with VALMT.HE's 480.30%. Walter Schloss would see both as similarly efficient over the decade.
-23.94%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while VALMT.HE is at 480.30%. Joel Greenblatt would question the firm’s operational model or cost structure.
-15.81%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 195.07%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.
143.23%
Positive 10Y CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a substantial advantage in bottom-line trajectory.
650.00%
Positive 5Y CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might view this as a strong mid-term relative advantage.
66.67%
3Y net income/share CAGR above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 0.08%. David Dodd would confirm the company’s short-term strategies outmatch the competitor significantly.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
52.10%
Positive 5Y equity/share CAGR while VALMT.HE is negative. John Neff might see a clear edge in retaining earnings or managing capital better.
10.56%
3Y equity/share CAGR above 1.5x VALMT.HE's 4.77%. David Dodd verifies the company’s short-term capital management far exceeds the competitor’s pace.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Negative 5Y dividend/share CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 0.00%. Joel Greenblatt sees a weaker commitment to dividends vs. a competitor that might be growing them.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
18.92%
Our AR growth while VALMT.HE is cutting. John Neff questions if the competitor outperforms in collections or if we’re pushing credit to maintain sales.
3.95%
Inventory growth well above VALMT.HE's 1.36%. Michael Burry suspects overshooting production or weaker sell-through vs. the competitor.
3.61%
Positive asset growth while VALMT.HE is shrinking. John Neff sees potential for us to outgrow the competitor if returns are solid.
-2.92%
Both erode book value/share. Martin Whitman suspects a difficult environment or poor capital deployment for both players.
7.18%
We have some new debt while VALMT.HE reduces theirs. John Neff sees the competitor as more cautious unless our expansions pay off strongly.
-100.00%
Both reduce R&D yoy. Martin Whitman sees an industry shifting to cost reduction or limited breakthroughs in the near term.
-3.68%
Both reduce SG&A yoy. Martin Whitman sees a cost war or cyclical slowdown forcing overhead cuts.