Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)

Negative revenue growth while VALMT.HE stands at 17.99%. Joel Greenblatt would look for strategic missteps or cyclical reasons.

Negative gross profit growth while VALMT.HE is at 15.11%. Joel Greenblatt would examine cost competitiveness or demand decline.

Negative EBIT growth while VALMT.HE is at 36.70%. Joel Greenblatt would demand a turnaround plan focusing on core profitability.

Negative operating income growth while VALMT.HE is at 37.61%. Joel Greenblatt would press for urgent turnaround measures.

Negative net income growth while VALMT.HE stands at 44.12%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a reevaluation of cost or revenue strategies.

Negative EPS growth while VALMT.HE is at 43.24%. Joel Greenblatt would expect urgent managerial action on costs or revenue drivers.

Negative diluted EPS growth while VALMT.HE is at 43.24%. Joel Greenblatt would require immediate efforts to restrain share issuance or boost net income.

Share count expansion well above VALMT.HE's 0.61%. Michael Burry would question if management is raising capital unnecessarily or is over-incentivizing employees with stock.

Diluted share count expanding well above VALMT.HE's 0.61%. Michael Burry would fear significant dilution to existing owners' stakes.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 54.90%. Joel Greenblatt would question if the company is failing to keep pace with industry changes.

Negative 5Y CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 12.09%. Joel Greenblatt would push for a turnaround plan or reevaluation of the company’s product line.

Negative 3Y CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 2.93%. Joel Greenblatt would look for missteps or fading competitiveness that hurt sales.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 366.74%. Joel Greenblatt would scrutinize managerial effectiveness and product competitiveness.

Both show negative mid-term OCF/share growth. Martin Whitman might suspect a challenged environment or large capital demands for both.

Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while VALMT.HE stands at 48.34%. Joel Greenblatt would demand an urgent turnaround in the firm’s cost or revenue drivers.

Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR while VALMT.HE is at 208.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees a major red flag in long-term profit erosion.

Both exhibit negative net income/share growth over five years. Martin Whitman would suspect a challenging environment for the entire niche.

Both companies show negative 3Y net income/share growth. Martin Whitman suspects macro or sector-specific headwinds in the short run.

10Y equity/share CAGR at 50-75% of VALMT.HE's 155.07%. Martin Whitman would note a lag in capital accumulation vs. the competitor.

Below 50% of VALMT.HE's 102.84%. Michael Burry sees a substantially weaker mid-term book value expansion strategy in place.

Negative 3Y equity/share growth while VALMT.HE is at 58.93%. Joel Greenblatt demands an urgent fix in capital structure or profitability vs. the competitor.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

We have a declining book value while VALMT.HE shows 4.85%. Joel Greenblatt sees a fundamental disadvantage in net worth creation vs. the competitor.