5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.02%
Negative revenue growth while Packaging & Containers median is 3.46%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-4.03%
Negative gross profit growth while Packaging & Containers median is 2.73%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-16.95%
Negative EBIT growth while Packaging & Containers median is 2.85%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-16.95%
Negative operating income growth while Packaging & Containers median is 11.96%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
120.00%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 6.23%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
200.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 4.17%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
200.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 6.45%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
-26.67%
Share reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-26.67%
Diluted share reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
5272.73%
Dividend growth of 5272.73% while Packaging & Containers median is flat. Walter Schloss might appreciate at least a modest improvement.
-108.37%
Negative OCF growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-148.00%
Negative FCF growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-2.89%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 9.20%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-2.89%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 8.13%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-32.38%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 5.67%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
79.10%
OCF/share CAGR of 79.10% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
79.10%
OCF/share CAGR of 79.10% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
84.71%
Positive short-term OCF/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is negative. Peter Lynch would note a strong competitive advantage in near-term cash generation.
120.93%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 50.81% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
120.93%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 9.01%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
300.00%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 11.23%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-22.04%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Packaging & Containers median is 10.13%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.87%
AR shrinking while Packaging & Containers median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
4.86%
Inventory growth of 4.86% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
0.06%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 0.02%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
32.93%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
3.44%
Debt growth of 3.44% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.39%
SG&A growth of 5.39% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.