5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-4.60%
Negative revenue growth while Packaging & Containers median is -0.58%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-59.67%
Negative gross profit growth while Packaging & Containers median is -2.08%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
58.55%
Positive EBIT growth while Packaging & Containers median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
58.55%
Positive operating income growth while Packaging & Containers is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
331.94%
Positive net income growth while Packaging & Containers median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
332.00%
Positive EPS growth while Packaging & Containers median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
332.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Packaging & Containers median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
279.31%
OCF growth of 279.31% while Packaging & Containers is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
102.76%
FCF growth of 102.76% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-30.44%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 19.32%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-30.44%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 13.47%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-34.95%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 8.31%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-29.20%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-29.20%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
265.51%
3Y OCF/share growth of 265.51% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
140.23%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 53.69% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
140.23%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 80.04%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
227.62%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 32.35%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
-18.41%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Packaging & Containers median is 7.64%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-18.41%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Packaging & Containers median is 29.84%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-22.84%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Packaging & Containers median is 15.39%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-45.38%
AR shrinking while Packaging & Containers median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
4.43%
We have slight inventory growth while Packaging & Containers is cutting. Peter Lynch wonders if we expect bigger future sales or if peers see a looming downturn.
-1.77%
Assets shrink while Packaging & Containers median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
3.04%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-6.26%
Debt is shrinking while Packaging & Containers median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-5.95%
SG&A decline while Packaging & Containers grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.