5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-5.70%
Negative revenue growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-52.50%
Negative gross profit growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-10.23%
Negative EBIT growth while Packaging & Containers median is -9.09%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-10.23%
Negative operating income growth while Packaging & Containers median is -6.82%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
7.12%
Net income growth of 7.12% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
9.09%
EPS growth of 9.09% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
9.09%
Diluted EPS growth of 9.09% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
57.19%
OCF growth of 57.19% while Packaging & Containers is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
31.61%
FCF growth of 31.61% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-33.99%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 13.19%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-23.64%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 11.67%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-12.31%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 5.35%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
129.37%
OCF/share CAGR of 129.37% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
390.08%
OCF/share CAGR of 390.08% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
38.56%
3Y OCF/share growth of 38.56% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
154.88%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 69.34% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
-9.36%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 37.93%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
569.68%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 41.40%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
12.96%
Equity/share CAGR near Packaging & Containers median. Charlie Munger could view it as standard for the sector’s long-term capital usage.
16.73%
5Y equity/share CAGR 75-90% of Packaging & Containers median. John Neff calls for higher returns or more efficient buybacks to match peers.
34.63%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Packaging & Containers median. Mohnish Pabrai credits disciplined capital allocation for short-term outperformance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-14.03%
AR shrinking while Packaging & Containers median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-1.73%
Decreasing inventory while Packaging & Containers is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
0.92%
Asset growth of 0.92% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
4.74%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-11.57%
Debt is shrinking while Packaging & Containers median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.77%
SG&A growth of 9.77% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.