PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.36%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 2.14%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
-7.00%
Negative gross profit growth while Packaging & Containers median is 1.92%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-22.32%
Negative EBIT growth while Packaging & Containers median is 2.62%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-22.32%
Negative operating income growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-22.45%
Negative net income growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-20.00%
Negative EPS growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-20.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-3.06%
Share reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-3.06%
Diluted share reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
20.20%
OCF growth of 20.20% while Packaging & Containers is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
12.87%
FCF growth of 12.87% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-15.64%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 12.96%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-13.13%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 8.29%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
4.03%
3Y revenue/share growth below 50% of Packaging & Containers median of 9.67%. Jim Chanos would suspect a significant short-term erosion in competitiveness.
272.69%
OCF/share CAGR of 272.69% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
926.17%
OCF/share CAGR of 926.17% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-31.90%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
141.86%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 59.53% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
100.00%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 28.87%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-20.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 12.02%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
22.37%
5Y equity/share CAGR near Packaging & Containers median. Charlie Munger finds it normal mid-term expansion for the industry.
22.73%
3Y equity/share CAGR near Packaging & Containers median. Charlie Munger notes it as typical short-term equity expansion in the sector.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
219.32%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 219.32% while Packaging & Containers is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
98.48%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 98.48% while Packaging & Containers is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
8.31%
AR growth of 8.31% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-3.36%
Decreasing inventory while Packaging & Containers is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-6.39%
Assets shrink while Packaging & Containers median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
6.92%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-21.68%
Debt is shrinking while Packaging & Containers median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
6.22%
SG&A growth of 6.22% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.