5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.35%
Positive revenue growth while Packaging & Containers median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
16.80%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 1.25%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
19.63%
EBIT growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 5.99%. Joel Greenblatt would examine whether a unique competitive edge supports this outperformance.
19.63%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 7.73%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
18.73%
Net income growth near Packaging & Containers median of 18.73%. Charlie Munger would see common industry factors at play.
21.43%
EPS growth near Packaging & Containers median of 20.45%. Charlie Munger might conclude it’s in line with industry norms.
21.43%
Diluted EPS growth near Packaging & Containers median of 21.17%. Charlie Munger would expect typical industry-level share usage and profit trends.
-2.23%
Share reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-2.23%
Diluted share reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
19.74%
Positive OCF growth while Packaging & Containers median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong relative advantage in operational efficiency.
970.59%
Positive FCF growth while Packaging & Containers median is negative. Peter Lynch might view this as a notable advantage over peers.
-26.09%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 23.37%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
1.14%
Below 50% of Packaging & Containers median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
8.90%
3Y revenue/share growth 50-75% of Packaging & Containers median of 12.86%. Guy Spier might worry about a waning short-term advantage.
591.58%
OCF/share CAGR of 591.58% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
299.37%
OCF/share CAGR of 299.37% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
258.96%
3Y OCF/share growth of 258.96% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
148.99%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 75.47% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
150.10%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 46.11%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
142.86%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 23.11%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
53.48%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 25.78%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
25.43%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Packaging & Containers median. Mohnish Pabrai credits disciplined capital allocation for short-term outperformance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
14.29%
Receivables growth far exceeding Packaging & Containers median. Jim Chanos suspects potential red flags in revenue quality.
10.73%
Inventory growth far above Packaging & Containers median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
-0.40%
Assets shrink while Packaging & Containers median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-1.83%
Negative BV/share change while Packaging & Containers median is 1.04%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-11.02%
Debt is shrinking while Packaging & Containers median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-100.00%
R&D dropping while Packaging & Containers median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-2.89%
SG&A decline while Packaging & Containers grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.