PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.05%
Negative revenue growth while Packaging & Containers median is 1.51%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-2.86%
Negative gross profit growth while Packaging & Containers median is 3.02%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-35.47%
Negative EBIT growth while Packaging & Containers median is 1.82%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-35.47%
Negative operating income growth while Packaging & Containers median is 4.44%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-39.09%
Negative net income growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-41.18%
Negative EPS growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-41.18%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
3.54%
Share change of 3.54% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
3.54%
Diluted share change of 3.54% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-15.66%
Negative OCF growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-54.73%
Negative FCF growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-25.54%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 21.76%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-7.94%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 9.71%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
20.17%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 12.26%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
240.15%
OCF/share CAGR of 240.15% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-68.02%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
247.30%
3Y OCF/share growth of 247.30% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
134.89%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 60.35% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
105.96%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 8.41%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
66.67%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 0.57%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
46.50%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 9.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
36.39%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 20.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
233.14%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 233.14% while Packaging & Containers is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
81.82%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 81.82% while Packaging & Containers is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-3.07%
AR shrinking while Packaging & Containers median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
1.73%
We have slight inventory growth while Packaging & Containers is cutting. Peter Lynch wonders if we expect bigger future sales or if peers see a looming downturn.
-1.96%
Assets shrink while Packaging & Containers median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-2.70%
Negative BV/share change while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
18.05%
Debt growth of 18.05% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.57%
SG&A growth far above Packaging & Containers median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.