PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.32%
Negative revenue growth while Packaging & Containers median is -1.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
8.60%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 1.34%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
69.00%
Positive EBIT growth while Packaging & Containers median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
69.00%
Positive operating income growth while Packaging & Containers is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
36.42%
Net income growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 1.77%. Joel Greenblatt would check if brand strength or cost advantages fuel this outperformance.
20.00%
EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 1.54%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if consistent earnings expansion underpins these gains.
20.00%
Diluted EPS growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 1.56%. Joel Greenblatt would confirm if strong net income growth or buybacks drive outperformance.
13.68%
Share change of 13.68% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
13.68%
Diluted share change of 13.68% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.71%
Negative OCF growth while Packaging & Containers median is -28.10%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
35.62%
Positive FCF growth while Packaging & Containers median is negative. Peter Lynch might view this as a notable advantage over peers.
-32.58%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 17.44%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-20.63%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 14.49%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-1.38%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 8.71%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
259.95%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 9.10% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
117.57%
OCF/share CAGR of 117.57% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
190.16%
3Y OCF/share growth of 190.16% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
0.00%
Below 50% of Packaging & Containers median. Jim Chanos would suspect deeper issues limiting long-term profit growth.
-33.33%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 6.61%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-40.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is -3.79%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
19.20%
Equity/share CAGR 50-75% of Packaging & Containers median. Guy Spier sees subpar expansion vs. peers’ net worth growth.
24.65%
5Y equity/share CAGR 75-90% of Packaging & Containers median. John Neff calls for higher returns or more efficient buybacks to match peers.
18.48%
3Y equity/share CAGR near Packaging & Containers median. Charlie Munger notes it as typical short-term equity expansion in the sector.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.35%
AR shrinking while Packaging & Containers median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-6.98%
Decreasing inventory while Packaging & Containers is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-1.79%
Assets shrink while Packaging & Containers median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-13.40%
Negative BV/share change while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-0.07%
Debt is shrinking while Packaging & Containers median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-100.00%
R&D dropping while Packaging & Containers median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-14.50%
SG&A decline while Packaging & Containers grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.