PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.21%
Revenue growth of 0.21% vs. zero growth in Packaging & Containers. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
15.43%
Gross profit growth of 15.43% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
96.75%
EBIT growth of 96.75% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
96.75%
Operating income growth of 96.75% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
133.94%
Net income growth of 133.94% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
150.00%
EPS growth of 150.00% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
150.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 150.00% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-6.43%
Share reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-6.43%
Diluted share reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-9.63%
Negative OCF growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-31.92%
Negative FCF growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-45.85%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 5.76%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-4.11%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 1.19%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
12.57%
3Y CAGR of 12.57% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
354.26%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 45.58% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
37.09%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 18.93%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
119.88%
3Y OCF/share growth > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 12.14%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent competitive advantage translating into cash improvements.
600.00%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 41.10% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
-0.00%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
66.67%
Positive 3Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is negative. Peter Lynch sees a big short-term advantage vs. peers struggling with profit declines.
3.68%
Below 50% of Packaging & Containers median. Jim Chanos might suspect fundamental issues limiting equity creation over a decade.
33.38%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Packaging & Containers median. Mohnish Pabrai might see disciplined retention of earnings behind outperformance.
31.55%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 16.24%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
129.06%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 129.06% while Packaging & Containers is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
42.58%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 42.58% while Packaging & Containers is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
2.44%
AR growth of 2.44% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
6.19%
Inventory growth of 6.19% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-1.35%
Assets shrink while Packaging & Containers median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
3.07%
BV/share growth of 3.07% while Packaging & Containers is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
4.18%
Debt growth of 4.18% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.87%
Our SG&A slightly up while Packaging & Containers is cutting. Peter Lynch wonders if we overspend or if the median underinvests in marketing.