5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.40%
Revenue growth near Packaging & Containers median of 0.40%. Charlie Munger might attribute this to overall industry trends.
-0.13%
Negative gross profit growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
3.20%
EBIT growth of 3.20% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
3.20%
Operating income growth of 3.20% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
4.89%
Net income growth of 4.89% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
7.69%
EPS growth of 7.69% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
7.69%
Diluted EPS growth of 7.69% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-2.60%
Share reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-2.60%
Diluted share reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.87%
OCF growth of 8.87% while Packaging & Containers is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
30.49%
FCF growth of 30.49% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-34.34%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 15.01%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-2.62%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 9.48%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
6.36%
3Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 5.58%. Mohnish Pabrai would attribute it to strong near-term market positioning.
515.31%
OCF/share CAGR of 515.31% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
16.93%
5Y OCF/share growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 4.29%. Joel Greenblatt might see a strong moat or efficient cost structure driving outperformance.
-22.54%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
306.82%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 71.46% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
76.98%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 22.90%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
18.81%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 0.09%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
28.48%
Equity/share CAGR near Packaging & Containers median. Charlie Munger could view it as standard for the sector’s long-term capital usage.
27.95%
5Y equity/share CAGR near Packaging & Containers median. Charlie Munger finds it normal mid-term expansion for the industry.
20.26%
3Y equity/share CAGR near Packaging & Containers median. Charlie Munger notes it as typical short-term equity expansion in the sector.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.55%
AR shrinking while Packaging & Containers median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-2.82%
Decreasing inventory while Packaging & Containers is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
3.16%
Asset growth of 3.16% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
8.29%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-2.13%
Debt is shrinking while Packaging & Containers median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.04%
SG&A growth far above Packaging & Containers median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.