5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.77%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 3.96%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
7.65%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 3.65%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
-0.91%
Negative EBIT growth while Packaging & Containers median is 2.14%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-0.91%
Negative operating income growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-3.88%
Negative net income growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-3.23%
Negative EPS growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-3.23%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.24%
Share reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.68%
Diluted share reduction while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.08%
Negative OCF growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-429.73%
Negative FCF growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
14.89%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 50-75% of Packaging & Containers median of 24.22%. Guy Spier would worry about subpar top-line expansion over the long run.
50.41%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 22.89%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
39.55%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 17.45%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
107.78%
OCF/share CAGR of 107.78% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-92.02%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-91.00%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-29.93%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Packaging & Containers median of 74.79%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
233.33%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 35.47%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
200.00%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 39.36%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
99.92%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 30.41% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
75.89%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 29.01%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
39.83%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 18.39%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
155.52%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 155.52% while Packaging & Containers is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
56.16%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 56.16% while Packaging & Containers is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-100.00%
AR shrinking while Packaging & Containers median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
8.25%
Inventory growth far above Packaging & Containers median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
-3.18%
Assets shrink while Packaging & Containers median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
2.95%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-1.37%
Debt is shrinking while Packaging & Containers median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.20%
SG&A growth of 10.20% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.