5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-0.49%
Negative revenue growth while Packaging & Containers median is -0.03%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-7.01%
Negative gross profit growth while Packaging & Containers median is -0.70%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-11.66%
Negative EBIT growth while Packaging & Containers median is -4.03%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-11.66%
Negative operating income growth while Packaging & Containers median is -1.97%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
10.43%
Positive net income growth while Packaging & Containers median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
10.00%
EPS growth of 10.00% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
10.00%
Diluted EPS growth of 10.00% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
0.24%
Share change of 0.24% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.39%
Diluted share change of 0.39% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts while Packaging & Containers median is -0.01%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
2359.26%
OCF growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 0.08%. Joel Greenblatt would see if a superior business model or cost structure drives strong cash generation.
125.27%
FCF growth of 125.27% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-14.44%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 20.86%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
35.92%
5Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 24.38%. Mohnish Pabrai might attribute the outperformance to scale or brand strength.
32.32%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 19.01%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
37.33%
OCF/share CAGR of 37.33% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-1.14%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
51.60%
3Y OCF/share growth of 51.60% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
932.84%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 32.15% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
200.46%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 18.75%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
261.54%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 30.99%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
68.01%
Equity/share CAGR near Packaging & Containers median. Charlie Munger could view it as standard for the sector’s long-term capital usage.
77.29%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 31.73%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
51.46%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 19.50%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.48%
Inventory growth far above Packaging & Containers median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
10.59%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 0.05%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
11.92%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
0.61%
Slightly rising debt while Packaging & Containers median is deleveraging. Peter Lynch wonders if the firm lags behind peers in risk control or invests in more expansions.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-27.51%
SG&A decline while Packaging & Containers grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.