PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.62%
Negative revenue growth while Packaging & Containers median is -0.11%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
6.88%
Gross profit growth 75-90% of Packaging & Containers median of 8.23%. John Neff would watch if higher volumes can lift margins eventually.
12.52%
EBIT growth below 50% of Packaging & Containers median of 31.69%. Jim Chanos would suspect fundamental operating challenges.
12.52%
Operating income growth below 50% of Packaging & Containers median of 35.71%. Jim Chanos would suspect structural cost disadvantages.
-9.83%
Negative net income growth while Packaging & Containers median is 29.05%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-9.52%
Negative EPS growth while Packaging & Containers median is 25.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-9.52%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Packaging & Containers median is 25.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.08%
Share change of 0.08% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.08%
Diluted share change of 0.08% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
80.06%
Positive OCF growth while Packaging & Containers median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong relative advantage in operational efficiency.
798.98%
Positive FCF growth while Packaging & Containers median is negative. Peter Lynch might view this as a notable advantage over peers.
14.23%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 50-75% of Packaging & Containers median of 22.02%. Guy Spier would worry about subpar top-line expansion over the long run.
11.52%
5Y revenue/share growth 50-75% of Packaging & Containers median of 16.41%. Guy Spier might worry about slower mid-term expansions vs. peers.
19.20%
3Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 16.32%. Mohnish Pabrai would attribute it to strong near-term market positioning.
222.39%
OCF/share CAGR of 222.39% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
323.88%
OCF/share CAGR of 323.88% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
64.02%
3Y OCF/share growth of 64.02% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
856.85%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 50.83% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
27.58%
5Y net income/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Packaging & Containers median. Mohnish Pabrai would check that top-line growth and share count management both contribute.
218.95%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 32.39%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
162.49%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 60.68% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
72.58%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 36.63%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
53.08%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 25.93%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.30%
AR shrinking while Packaging & Containers median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
7.14%
Inventory growth far above Packaging & Containers median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
0.87%
Asset growth 1.25-1.5x Packaging & Containers median. Mohnish Pabrai sees if expansions are strategic and well-supported by end demand.
-6.05%
Negative BV/share change while Packaging & Containers median is 1.78%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-0.29%
Debt is shrinking while Packaging & Containers median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-100.00%
R&D dropping while Packaging & Containers median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-7.92%
SG&A decline while Packaging & Containers grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.