PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-3.85%
Negative revenue growth while Packaging & Containers median is -1.06%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-16.31%
Negative gross profit growth while Packaging & Containers median is -0.84%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-89.49%
Negative EBIT growth while Packaging & Containers median is -5.87%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-89.49%
Negative operating income growth while Packaging & Containers median is -6.76%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-76.26%
Negative net income growth while Packaging & Containers median is -9.08%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-76.43%
Negative EPS growth while Packaging & Containers median is -8.94%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-76.43%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Packaging & Containers median is -8.96%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.28%
Share change of 0.28% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.28%
Diluted share change of 0.28% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
391.03%
OCF growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 1.43%. Joel Greenblatt would see if a superior business model or cost structure drives strong cash generation.
191.44%
FCF growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 2.96%. Joel Greenblatt would see if high profitability or prudent capex drives outperformance.
-3.24%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 19.41%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
2.12%
Below 50% of Packaging & Containers median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
3.58%
3Y revenue/share growth below 50% of Packaging & Containers median of 19.94%. Jim Chanos would suspect a significant short-term erosion in competitiveness.
793.33%
OCF/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 5.86% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would verify if a unique competitive moat underlies these cash flows.
43.94%
OCF/share CAGR of 43.94% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
4.91%
3Y OCF/share growth of 4.91% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
-33.77%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Packaging & Containers median of 47.64%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-91.72%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 8.47%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-89.81%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
129.33%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 57.71% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
48.29%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 30.36%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
44.74%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 23.18%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-11.53%
AR shrinking while Packaging & Containers median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-13.82%
Decreasing inventory while Packaging & Containers is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-3.77%
Assets shrink while Packaging & Containers median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-2.31%
Negative BV/share change while Packaging & Containers median is 1.67%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-2.03%
Debt is shrinking while Packaging & Containers median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.32%
SG&A decline while Packaging & Containers grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.