5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.40%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 1.75%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
-35.41%
Negative gross profit growth while Packaging & Containers median is 1.20%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-61.56%
Negative EBIT growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.55%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-61.56%
Negative operating income growth while Packaging & Containers median is 2.41%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-168.70%
Negative net income growth while Packaging & Containers median is 2.55%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-168.65%
Negative EPS growth while Packaging & Containers median is 2.91%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-168.65%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Packaging & Containers median is 6.08%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.13%
Share change of 0.13% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.13%
Diluted share change of 0.13% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.86%
Negative OCF growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-18.92%
Negative FCF growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
0.64%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Packaging & Containers median of 16.81%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
9.32%
5Y revenue/share growth 50-75% of Packaging & Containers median of 13.42%. Guy Spier might worry about slower mid-term expansions vs. peers.
-8.73%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 8.91%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-109.17%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-128.66%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-106.39%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-152.24%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Packaging & Containers median of 31.64%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
-125.37%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 17.92%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-111.03%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is -9.89%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
103.75%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 18.00% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
39.08%
5Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Packaging & Containers median. Mohnish Pabrai might see disciplined retention of earnings behind outperformance.
11.68%
3Y equity/share CAGR 50-75% of Packaging & Containers median. Guy Spier suspects suboptimal short-term capital usage vs. peers.
193.55%
Dividend/share CAGR of 193.55% while Packaging & Containers is zero. Walter Schloss sees a minor improvement that could compound if the firm maintains consistent raises.
-11.88%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
-4.37%
Dividend reductions while Packaging & Containers median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
14.48%
AR growth of 14.48% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
1.28%
Inventory growth of 1.28% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-1.36%
Assets shrink while Packaging & Containers median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-0.26%
Negative BV/share change while Packaging & Containers median is 0.44%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
8.90%
Debt growth of 8.90% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.92%
SG&A growth of 9.92% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.