PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.12%
Negative revenue growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.10%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
202.67%
Gross profit growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 2.65%. Joel Greenblatt would check if cost advantages or brand equity drive this surge.
269.03%
Positive EBIT growth while Packaging & Containers median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
269.03%
Positive operating income growth while Packaging & Containers is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
418.89%
Positive net income growth while Packaging & Containers median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
414.96%
Positive EPS growth while Packaging & Containers median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
414.96%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Packaging & Containers median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
1.11%
Share change of 1.11% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
1.11%
Diluted share change of 1.11% while Packaging & Containers median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
153.49%
OCF growth of 153.49% while Packaging & Containers is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
-74.15%
Negative FCF growth while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-3.36%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 22.96%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
1.08%
Below 50% of Packaging & Containers median. Jim Chanos would suspect structural disadvantages or a higher share base limiting per-share growth.
-4.19%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 9.13%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
-91.08%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-89.59%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-92.29%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
37.31%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 17.54% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
-12.49%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is 14.64%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-64.04%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Packaging & Containers median is -20.60%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
108.37%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 62.87% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
36.57%
5Y equity/share CAGR near Packaging & Containers median. Charlie Munger finds it normal mid-term expansion for the industry.
7.77%
Below 50% of Packaging & Containers median. Jim Chanos worries about inadequate short-term profitability or repeated asset impairments.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
AR shrinking while Packaging & Containers median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
3.40%
Inventory growth far above Packaging & Containers median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
2.00%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median of 0.34%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
1.73%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Packaging & Containers median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-80.84%
Debt is shrinking while Packaging & Containers median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
SG&A decline while Packaging & Containers grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.