PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-6.67%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-79.85%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
59.38%
EBIT growth of 59.38% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
59.38%
Operating income growth of 59.38% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
44.07%
Net income growth of 44.07% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
35.29%
EPS growth of 35.29% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
35.29%
Diluted EPS growth of 35.29% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-13.56%
Share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-13.56%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.88%
OCF growth of 5.88% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
107.14%
FCF growth of 107.14% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
5.21%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 50-75% of Consumer Cyclical median of 8.84%. Guy Spier would worry about subpar top-line expansion over the long run.
5.21%
5Y revenue/share growth 75-90% of Consumer Cyclical median of 6.07%. John Neff would expect a plan to align with peers or surpass them.
5.21%
3Y revenue/share growth 1.25-1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 4.59%. Mohnish Pabrai would attribute it to strong near-term market positioning.
-71.64%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-71.64%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-71.64%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
54.17%
Net income/share CAGR 75-90% of Consumer Cyclical median. John Neff would push for cost or revenue enhancements to match peers.
54.17%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 35.01%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
54.17%
3Y net income/share CAGR near Consumer Cyclical median. Charlie Munger sees standard sector-level performance in the last few years.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.39%
Inventory growth far above Consumer Cyclical median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
0.21%
Asset growth of 0.21% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
11.60%
BV/share growth of 11.60% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
3.40%
Debt growth of 3.40% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.