Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)

Negative revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.

Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.

Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.

Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.

Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.

Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.

Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.

Share change of 10.58% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.

Diluted share change of 10.58% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Negative OCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.

Negative FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.

Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 12.10%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.

Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 9.37%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.

Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 9.89%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.

Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.

Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.

Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.

Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Consumer Cyclical median of 64.20%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.

Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 28.89%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.

Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 65.33%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.

Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.

Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.44%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.

Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 7.26%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.

Decreasing inventory while Consumer Cyclical is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.

Assets shrink while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.

Negative BV/share change while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.85%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.

Debt is shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.