PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.11%
Revenue growth of 5.11% vs. zero growth in Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
8.69%
Gross profit growth of 8.69% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
-15.12%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-15.12%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-80.00%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-84.62%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-84.62%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
30.00%
Share change of 30.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
30.00%
Diluted share change of 30.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
240.32%
OCF growth of 240.32% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
167.70%
FCF growth of 167.70% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-28.85%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 16.86%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-28.85%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 10.95%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-29.64%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 12.94%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
623.18%
OCF/share CAGR of 623.18% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
623.18%
OCF/share CAGR of 623.18% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
181.38%
3Y OCF/share growth of 181.38% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
105.76%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 59.90% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
105.76%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 42.07%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-66.67%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 25.25%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-30.48%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 10.24%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-80.21%
Dividend reductions while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees a near-term disadvantage if peers maintain or raise payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
2.78%
Inventory growth far above Consumer Cyclical median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
-1.92%
Assets shrink while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-25.54%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.02%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-7.64%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.