5.46 - 5.64
4.95 - 8.28
2.0K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-282.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.80%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-56.27%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-80.35%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-80.35%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-70.67%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-69.81%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-69.81%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-2.89%
Share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-2.89%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.83%
OCF growth of 44.83% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
21.40%
FCF growth of 21.40% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-24.72%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 23.87%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-24.72%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 21.01%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-8.80%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 10.46%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
65.54%
OCF/share CAGR of 65.54% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
65.54%
OCF/share CAGR of 65.54% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
446.94%
3Y OCF/share growth of 446.94% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
108.19%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 28.11% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
108.19%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 21.41%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
102.79%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 102.79% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
-16.09%
Negative 10Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 5.37%. Seth Klarman would see a firm-specific weakness if peers still expand equity.
-16.09%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 22.15%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
10.00%
3Y equity/share CAGR 50-75% of Consumer Cyclical median. Guy Spier suspects suboptimal short-term capital usage vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-26.25%
AR shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-2.35%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Cyclical is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-0.32%
Assets shrink while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
1.41%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-2.90%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.26%
SG&A decline while Consumer Cyclical grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.