PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
5.27%
Positive revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a relative strength advantage in a tough sector.
145.19%
Positive gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
543.28%
EBIT growth of 543.28% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
543.28%
Operating income growth of 543.28% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
380.33%
Net income growth of 380.33% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
411.36%
EPS growth of 411.36% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
411.36%
Diluted EPS growth of 411.36% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-6.09%
Share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-6.09%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-56.26%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-83.99%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-14.10%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 22.36%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-15.06%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 20.15%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-9.93%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 9.30%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
572.66%
OCF/share CAGR of 572.66% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
173.52%
OCF/share CAGR of 173.52% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
8.39%
3Y OCF/share growth of 8.39% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
125.94%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 46.94% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
50.00%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 29.91%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
282.40%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 13.23%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.37%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 22.35%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
19.97%
3Y equity/share CAGR 1.25-1.5x Consumer Cyclical median. Mohnish Pabrai credits disciplined capital allocation for short-term outperformance.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts or stagnation while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a disadvantage in shareholder returns vs. peers.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
34.60%
AR growth of 34.60% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
4.72%
Inventory growth far above Consumer Cyclical median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
6.86%
Asset growth of 6.86% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
18.20%
BV/share growth of 18.20% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
0.72%
Debt growth of 0.72% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
-100.00%
R&D dropping while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
4.05%
SG&A growth of 4.05% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.