PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-2.92%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.10%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
0.85%
Gross profit growth 50-75% of Consumer Cyclical median of 1.18%. Guy Spier might worry about insufficient cost control or weaker pricing.
5.50%
EBIT growth of 5.50% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
5.50%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.01%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
-2.93%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.36%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-14.29%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.54%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-14.29%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.12%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
13.25%
Share change of 13.25% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
13.25%
Diluted share change of 13.25% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
0.45%
OCF growth of 0.45% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
5.36%
FCF growth of 5.36% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-38.04%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 15.05%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-42.49%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 14.31%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-36.19%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 7.53%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
4.86%
OCF/share CAGR of 4.86% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-217.21%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-355.17%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
120.93%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 24.87% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
135.29%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 3.20%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
-0.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 6.33%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-6.29%
Negative 5Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.72%. Seth Klarman suspects firm-specific weaknesses if peers grow equity mid-term.
-6.77%
Negative 3Y equity/share growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 5.50%. Seth Klarman sees a short-term weakness if peers still expand net worth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
132.59%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 132.59% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-7.18%
AR shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
6.31%
Inventory growth of 6.31% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-4.84%
Assets shrink while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-10.52%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
1.15%
Debt growth of 1.15% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest difference that matters if interest coverage is tight.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-4.74%
SG&A decline while Consumer Cyclical grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.