PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
6.68%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.40%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
-2.93%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.17%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
3.76%
EBIT growth of 3.76% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
3.76%
Operating income growth of 3.76% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
2.34%
Net income growth of 2.34% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
-10.00%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-10.00%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
13.71%
Share change of 13.71% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
13.71%
Diluted share change of 13.71% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
44.92%
OCF growth of 44.92% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
241.10%
FCF growth of 241.10% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-30.92%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 19.47%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-23.62%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 16.57%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-14.59%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 9.76%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
258.09%
OCF/share CAGR of 258.09% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
197.48%
OCF/share CAGR of 197.48% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-63.92%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
131.40%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 32.45% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
-78.98%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 22.87%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
85.36%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 16.19%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
13.66%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 4.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
16.47%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 7.61%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
103.59%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 103.59% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
9.45%
AR growth of 9.45% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-5.88%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Cyclical is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-1.86%
Assets shrink while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-7.18%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.65%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-3.10%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
9.07%
SG&A growth of 9.07% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.