5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
2.54%
Revenue growth of 2.54% vs. zero growth in Consumer Cyclical. Walter Schloss might still want to see if it can translate into profits.
-5.90%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-8.41%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-8.41%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-10.47%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.16%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-8.60%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-8.60%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-2.06%
Share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-2.06%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
42.67%
OCF growth of 42.67% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
99.25%
FCF growth of 99.25% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-29.49%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 37.55%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-4.39%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 14.95%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
16.34%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 10.74%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
-41.77%
Negative 10Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect the firm is failing to keep pace with industry peers.
-14.26%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-31.60%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
138.09%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 51.21% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
56.90%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 6.85%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
82.83%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 82.83% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
52.58%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 14.62%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
35.39%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 11.87%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.70%
AR shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-3.27%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Cyclical is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-0.08%
Assets shrink while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
3.61%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-1.14%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-12.62%
SG&A decline while Consumer Cyclical grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.