PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-1.32%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -14.31%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
8.60%
Positive gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
69.00%
Positive EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong competitive advantage in operations.
69.00%
Positive operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical is negative. Peter Lynch would spot a big relative advantage here.
36.42%
Positive net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch would view this as a notable competitive advantage.
20.00%
Positive EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong advantage in per-share earnings compared to peers.
20.00%
Positive diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a real advantage in how this firm manages share count or drives net income.
13.68%
Share change of 13.68% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
13.68%
Diluted share change of 13.68% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.71%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
35.62%
FCF growth of 35.62% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-32.58%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 3.36%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-20.63%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
-1.38%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would examine if the sector is otherwise stable, indicating a company-specific issue.
259.95%
OCF/share CAGR of 259.95% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
117.57%
OCF/share CAGR of 117.57% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
190.16%
3Y OCF/share growth of 190.16% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
0.00%
Positive 10Y net income/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical is negative. Peter Lynch sees a resilient enterprise vs. struggling peers.
-33.33%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is -33.33%. Seth Klarman might see a specific weakness if peers maintain profitable expansions.
-40.00%
Negative 3Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is -46.47%. Seth Klarman might see a pressing concern if the rest of the sector is stable or growing.
19.20%
Equity/share CAGR near Consumer Cyclical median. Charlie Munger could view it as standard for the sector’s long-term capital usage.
24.65%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 8.75%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
18.48%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 3.32%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-3.35%
AR shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-6.98%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Cyclical is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
-1.79%
Assets shrink while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
-13.40%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Cyclical median is -2.06%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-0.07%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-100.00%
R&D dropping while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-14.50%
SG&A decline while Consumer Cyclical grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.