5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
0.40%
Revenue growth below 50% of Consumer Cyclical median of 3.40%. Jim Chanos would be concerned about potential secular decline.
-0.13%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.18%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
3.20%
EBIT growth of 3.20% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
3.20%
Operating income growth of 3.20% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
4.89%
Net income growth of 4.89% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
7.69%
EPS growth of 7.69% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
7.69%
Diluted EPS growth of 7.69% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could improve over time.
-2.60%
Share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-2.60%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
8.87%
OCF growth of 8.87% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
30.49%
FCF growth of 30.49% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-34.34%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 10.32%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
-2.62%
Negative 5Y CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others are at least growing moderately, indicating a firm-specific problem.
6.36%
3Y CAGR of 6.36% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest improvement overshadowing the broader sector’s stagnation.
515.31%
OCF/share CAGR of 515.31% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
16.93%
OCF/share CAGR of 16.93% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
-22.54%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
306.82%
Net income/share CAGR of 306.82% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
76.98%
Net income/share CAGR of 76.98% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
18.81%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 18.81% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
28.48%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 9.66% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
27.95%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 6.04%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
20.26%
3Y equity/share CAGR of 20.26% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest short-term advantage that could compound if momentum persists.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-10.55%
AR shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-2.82%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Cyclical is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
3.16%
Asset growth of 3.16% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
8.29%
BV/share growth of 8.29% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-2.13%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
15.04%
SG&A growth far above Consumer Cyclical median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.