PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
12.58%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 3.84%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
-2.59%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.59%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
26.46%
EBIT growth of 26.46% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see a marginal edge that could be expanded upon.
26.46%
Operating income growth of 26.46% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand.
29.09%
Net income growth of 29.09% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see potential if moderate gains can keep rising.
-25.81%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-25.81%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.69%
Share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.69%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
697.62%
OCF growth of 697.62% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
524.12%
FCF growth of 524.12% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight edge that could compound over time.
-17.22%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 17.34%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
43.94%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 5.22%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
5.72%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
674.87%
OCF/share CAGR of 674.87% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
761.09%
OCF/share CAGR of 761.09% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
264.22%
3Y OCF/share growth of 264.22% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
235.29%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 9.89% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
283.33%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 12.79%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
91.67%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 7.26%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
59.17%
Equity/share CAGR of 59.17% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
69.86%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.49%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
29.41%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
67.55%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 67.55% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
22.04%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 22.04% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
8.76%
AR growth of 8.76% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if the difference points to new credit strategy or stronger sales push.
-5.91%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Cyclical is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
2.40%
Asset growth of 2.40% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
7.30%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-2.48%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-8.39%
SG&A decline while Consumer Cyclical grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.