PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.14%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 2.64%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-11.95%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 1.34%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-4.15%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-4.15%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -1.16%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-2.59%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -1.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-4.35%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-4.35%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.70%
Share change of 0.70% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
1.84%
Diluted share change of 1.84% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
-55.90%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-66.85%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
-29.30%
Negative 10Y revenue/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 21.00%. Seth Klarman would see if the entire sector or just this company faces long-term decline.
22.74%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 9.65%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
9.81%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.36%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
177.06%
OCF/share CAGR of 177.06% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-7.70%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
10.84%
3Y OCF/share growth of 10.84% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
302.27%
Net income/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 30.63% over a decade. Joel Greenblatt might see a standout compounder of earnings.
344.99%
5Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 6.12%. Joel Greenblatt might see superior mid-term capital allocation or product strength.
39.06%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 9.91%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
50.41%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 12.02% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
71.58%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 11.34%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
30.65%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 4.86%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-0.69%
AR shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
0.61%
Inventory reduction well below Consumer Cyclical median. Joel Greenblatt might see a sign of superior operational or supply-chain efficiency.
3.38%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 1.53%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
5.29%
BV/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median. Joel Greenblatt checks if consistent ROE or undervalued buybacks fuel this advantage.
-0.20%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
3.59%
SG&A growth far above Consumer Cyclical median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.