PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
11.77%
Revenue growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 2.25%. Joel Greenblatt would verify if operating margins keep pace with this top-line surge.
7.65%
Gross profit growth of 7.65% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that could be built upon.
-0.91%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-0.91%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-3.88%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-3.23%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-3.23%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.24%
Share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.68%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-97.08%
Negative OCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would ask if accounting or macro issues hamper the firm specifically.
-429.73%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
14.89%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 75-90% of Consumer Cyclical median of 17.61%. John Neff would seek operational improvements to catch up with peers.
50.41%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 8.38%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
39.55%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 3.46%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
107.78%
OCF/share CAGR of 107.78% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-92.02%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-91.00%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
-29.93%
Negative 10Y net income/share CAGR vs. Consumer Cyclical median of 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a fundamental problem if peers maintain growth.
233.33%
Net income/share CAGR of 233.33% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
200.00%
3Y net income/share CAGR of 200.00% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a small advantage that can be scaled further.
99.92%
Equity/share CAGR of 99.92% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage in net worth accumulation that could matter long term.
75.89%
5Y equity/share CAGR of 75.89% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight positive that might compound if management executes well.
39.83%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.26%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
155.52%
5Y dividend/share CAGR of 155.52% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees at least some improvement that could compound over time.
56.16%
3Y dividend/share CAGR of 56.16% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if the firm is at least inching up payouts.
-100.00%
AR shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
8.25%
Inventory growth of 8.25% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss checks if we’re preparing for a sales push or risking overstock.
-3.18%
Assets shrink while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman might see a strategic refocus or potential missed expansion if demand is present.
2.95%
BV/share growth of 2.95% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-1.37%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
10.20%
SG&A growth of 10.20% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a modest overhead increase needing revenue justification.