PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-7.34%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
-27.70%
Negative gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would suspect poor product pricing or inefficient production.
-44.39%
Negative EBIT growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -1.81%. Seth Klarman would check if external or internal factors caused the decline.
-44.39%
Negative operating income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -0.42%. Seth Klarman would check if structural or cyclical issues are at play.
-35.91%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -3.89%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-36.36%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -0.98%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-36.36%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -1.63%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
-0.28%
Share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative advantage if others are diluting.
-0.43%
Diluted share reduction while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see an advantage if others are still diluting.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
5.72%
OCF growth of 5.72% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest positive difference, which can compound over time.
-152.97%
Negative FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others in the industry are still generating positive expansions in free cash.
2.28%
10Y revenue/share CAGR below 50% of Consumer Cyclical median of 17.90%. Jim Chanos would suspect deep structural or market share issues.
33.94%
5Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 5.41%. Joel Greenblatt would see if the company’s moat drives rapid mid-term expansion.
14.59%
3Y revenue/share growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 6.85%. Joel Greenblatt might see a short-term competitive advantage at play.
293.42%
OCF/share CAGR of 293.42% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
-33.32%
Negative 5Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman might see a firm-specific issue if peers still expand cash flow.
-28.40%
Negative 3Y OCF/share CAGR while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would check whether it’s cyclical or a firm-specific problem.
63.39%
Net income/share CAGR of 63.39% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
80.25%
Net income/share CAGR of 80.25% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
324.81%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 5.14%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
109.80%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 11.41% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
79.73%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 5.09%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
42.21%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 6.27%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-20.44%
AR shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
-1.38%
Decreasing inventory while Consumer Cyclical is rising. Seth Klarman might see an efficiency advantage or possibly a sign of weaker sales future.
2.21%
Asset growth of 2.21% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight advantage if expansions yield good returns on capital.
6.24%
BV/share growth of 6.24% while Consumer Cyclical is zero. Walter Schloss sees a slight lead that can expand if sustained over time.
-2.52%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
33.58%
SG&A growth far above Consumer Cyclical median. Jim Chanos sees potential red flags in cost management or diminishing returns on spending.