PerformanceRiskValuationProfitabilityCashflowLiquidityESGRevenue & Geographic ExposureForecastFinancial GrowthIncome GrowthCashflow GrowthBalance Sheet Growth
Metsä Board Oyj (METSA.HE)
5.580.04 (-0.71%)
5.38 - 5.60
4.95 - 8.28
2.3K / 2.4K (Avg.)
-279.00 | -0.02
Steady, sustainable growth is a hallmark of high-quality businesses. Value investors watch these metrics to confirm that the company's fundamental performance aligns with—or outpaces—its current market valuation.
-9.62%
Negative revenue growth while Consumer Cyclical median is -2.34%. Seth Klarman would investigate if the company is losing market share or facing a declining industry.
6.88%
Positive gross profit growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch would see a notable competitive edge in cost or pricing.
12.52%
EBIT growth 75-90% of Consumer Cyclical median of 15.92%. John Neff would demand margin improvements or operating leverage to catch up.
12.52%
Operating income growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 6.97%. Joel Greenblatt would see if unique processes drive exceptional profitability.
-9.83%
Negative net income growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 15.81%. Seth Klarman would investigate factors dragging net income down.
-9.52%
Negative EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 13.55%. Seth Klarman would explore whether share dilution or profit declines are to blame.
-9.52%
Negative diluted EPS growth while Consumer Cyclical median is 13.39%. Seth Klarman would look for the cause: weakened profitability or heavier share issuance.
0.08%
Share change of 0.08% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss would see if the modest difference matters long-term.
0.08%
Diluted share change of 0.08% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight difference in equity issuance policy.
-100.00%
Dividend cuts while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see if others maintain or grow payouts, highlighting a relative weakness.
80.06%
Positive OCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch might see a strong relative advantage in operational efficiency.
798.98%
Positive FCF growth while Consumer Cyclical median is negative. Peter Lynch might view this as a notable advantage over peers.
14.23%
10Y revenue/share CAGR 50-75% of Consumer Cyclical median of 21.96%. Guy Spier would worry about subpar top-line expansion over the long run.
11.52%
5Y revenue/share growth near Consumer Cyclical median of 11.22%. Charlie Munger might see typical industry or economic growth patterns.
19.20%
3Y revenue/share growth 75-90% of Consumer Cyclical median of 24.81%. John Neff would see if operational improvements can catch up with peers.
222.39%
OCF/share CAGR of 222.39% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest edge that can add up if momentum improves.
323.88%
OCF/share CAGR of 323.88% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a slight advantage that can compound if momentum builds.
64.02%
3Y OCF/share growth of 64.02% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that could compound if momentum holds.
856.85%
Net income/share CAGR of 856.85% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a marginal edge that can grow if the firm invests wisely.
27.58%
Net income/share CAGR of 27.58% while Consumer Cyclical median is zero. Walter Schloss might see a modest advantage that can expand mid-term.
218.95%
3Y net income/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 56.44%. Joel Greenblatt might see a recent surge from market share gains or cost synergy.
162.49%
Equity/share CAGR exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 20.97% over 10 years. Joel Greenblatt would see if a high ROE underlies this compounding advantage.
72.58%
5Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 7.03%. Joel Greenblatt sees a possible ROE advantage or fewer share issuances boosting book value.
53.08%
3Y equity/share CAGR > 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 12.12%. Joel Greenblatt sees strong short-term returns on equity fueling net worth growth.
-100.00%
Dividend declines over 10 years while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.00%. Seth Klarman would see a relative disadvantage if peers consistently raised payouts.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
No Data
No Data available this quarter, please select a different quarter.
-2.30%
AR shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median grows. Seth Klarman sees potential advantage unless it signals declining demand.
7.14%
Inventory growth far above Consumer Cyclical median. Jim Chanos suspects major issues in demand forecasting or potential obsolescence risk.
0.87%
Asset growth exceeding 1.5x Consumer Cyclical median of 0.03%. Joel Greenblatt confirms strong expansions matched by adequate returns on those assets.
-6.05%
Negative BV/share change while Consumer Cyclical median is 0.48%. Seth Klarman sees a firm-specific weakness if peers accumulate net worth.
-0.29%
Debt is shrinking while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman might see an advantage if growth remains possible.
-100.00%
R&D dropping while Consumer Cyclical median is rising. Seth Klarman wonders if we risk ceding future innovation or if peers overspend.
-7.92%
SG&A decline while Consumer Cyclical grows. Seth Klarman sees potential cost advantage or a risk if it hurts future growth.